In 1997, Congress, in the conference report, H.R. 105-271, to the FY1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, directed the NRC to carry out a series of assessments of project management at the Department of Energy (DOE). This report, the 2002 Assessment, is the second in that series. It presents an examination of DOE's progress in improving program management over the past two years and offers recommendations regarding project management methodology and project oversight.
Read More
In 1997, Congress, in the conference report, H.R. 105-271, to the FY1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill, directed the NRC to carry out a series of assessments of project management at the Department of Energy (DOE). This report, the 2002 Assessment, is the second in that series. It presents an examination of DOE's progress in improving program management over the past two years and offers recommendations regarding project management methodology and project oversight.
Read Less
Add this copy of Progress in Improving Project Management at the to cart. $44.50, very good condition, Sold by Ground Zero Books, Ltd. rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Silver Spring, MD, UNITED STATES, published 2003 by The National Academies Press.
Edition:
Presumed first edition/first printing of the 2002 Assessment
Publisher:
National Academies Press
Published:
2003
Language:
English
Alibris ID:
13469937623
Shipping Options:
Standard Shipping: $4.90
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
Very good. Trade paperback (US). Glued binding. xiv, 111, [1] p. References. This report has been reviewed in draft from by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review was to provide candid and critical comments that would assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report met institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge.
