One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular ...
Read More
One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science. Table of Contents Front Matter Executive Summary Summary 1 Introduction 2 Scientific Methods and Knowledge 3 Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability 4 Reproducibility 5 Replicability 6 Improving Reproducibility and Replicability 7 Confidence in Science References Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff Appendix B: Agendas of Open Committee Meetings Appendix C: Recommendations Grouped by Stakeholder Appendix D: Using Bayes Analysis for Hypothesis Testing Appendix E: Conducting Replicable Surveys of Scientific Communities
Read Less
Add this copy of Reproducibility and Replicability in Science to cart. $58.03, very good condition, Sold by Pioneer Book rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Provo, UT, UNITED STATES, published 2019 by National Academies Press.
Add this copy of Reproducibility and Replicability in Science to cart. $102.09, good condition, Sold by Bonita rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Santa Clarita, CA, UNITED STATES, published 2019 by National Academies Press.
Add this copy of Reproducibility and Replicability in Science to cart. $62.02, fair condition, Sold by Valleys Books & More rated 1.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Roanoke, VA, UNITED STATES, published 2019 by National Academies Press.
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
Fair. A heavily used but readable copy. All text pages are present and legible. The cover and binding may be worn or slightly damaged. May be an older version with a different cover than what is shown in photos. Notes highlighting or minor water damage may be present. "From the library of" labels and missing extras like CDs or codes or dust jackets are possible.
